Collectors on Reddit are comparing EB05's English and Japanese SP treatments, but the set carries a $119.76 MSRP, zero PSA pop and no EV yet.
EB05, a 3.1x multiple with no track record
A thread on r/ONEPIECETCG this week catalogued where the English printing of the EB05 SP cards diverges from the Japanese release, the usual territory of border, texture and foil treatment that decides whether two versions of the same card trade as one market or two. It is a reasonable thing to argue about. It is also, from a pricing desk, an argument about a product our data still files as unreleased: EB05 shows months since release at -1, which is the polite way of saying nothing has been opened yet.
> $119.76 · EB05's MSRP, the only hard anchor on this set
Secondary pricing already implies a 3.1x multiple to that MSRP, with cost per pack running $15.29. There is no three-month or one-year CAGR to report, because there is no price history to annualize. The chart above is the whole story: a flat line waiting for a release date.
Inside the box
No box market price and no rip EV are published for EB05 yet, so any claim about what a sealed box returns in singles is somebody's guess, not a number. What we can do is show the shape of the problem. Every EV ratio on our EV page sits below 1.0, by design, because booster math is built to lose on average. The best ratios across tracked sets look like this.
| Set |
Box market |
Rip EV |
Ratio |
| OP11 |
$566.03 |
$430 |
0.76 |
| OP15 |
$255.08 |
$192 |
0.75 |
| OP14 |
$270.38 |
$182 |
0.67 |
| PRB02 |
$378.50 |
$247 |
0.65 |
| OP13 |
$439.27 |
$270 |
0.62 |
Read the ratio as cents of expected singles value per dollar of sealed box. The leader returns 76 cents on the dollar in expectation. Everything else returns less. When EB05 eventually prints an EV, that is the band it has to beat to look interesting, and a set already trading at a multiple to its sticker price starts the race from behind.
The SP question matters here precisely because SPs are what carries extra set EV. The strongest live comparison on the tape is Charlotte Flampe (SP), an EB01 SP that moved 80.1% in seven days to $49.14 and flagged on our whale screen. That is what a scarce SP does when demand concentrates. It is also a reminder that these cards are thin markets where a handful of sales reset the quote.
The graded side
PSA population on EB05 is zero. No gem rate, no graded premium multiple, no estimate of boxes already opened. Grading data is the slowest signal any set produces, typically taking months to be meaningful, and EB05 has not started the clock. Anyone pricing the English SPs against their Japanese counterparts is working from print-run intuition, not population reality.
When the submissions do arrive, the destruction tracker is where the opened-box estimate will show up, and that number is what eventually turns an SP from a rumor into a scarcity argument.
Long-term read
Our Long-Term Score for EB05 is 0 out of 10, labelled Unproven. That is not a criticism of the set. It is the mechanical output of a model fed no release history, no graded population and no EV, and it will stay there until the set has a tape to score.
The English versus Japanese SP debate is worth having, and the community will settle the visual differences long before the market settles the price gap. For now, the only verified figures attached to EB05 are a sticker price, a per-pack cost and a multiple. Track the rest on the screener as it fills in.